pharmaceutical agents developed specifically to
diagnose, prevent, or treat a rare medical condition (an orphan disease)
orphan disease
highly debilitating or life threatening disease
generally no adequate treatment available
rare diseases
disease that affects ~5/10,000 in the EU or <200,000 people in USA
5000-8000
e.g. CF, infantile spinal muscular atrophy, lysosomal
storage disorders, patent ductus arteriosus and
familial adenomatous polyposis
1/2 acquired in adulthood
e.g. glioma and renal cell carcinoma
not profitable, counteracted by a number of
financial and R&D related incentives
outlined by Kiran et al in 2012
extended exclusivity period of 7-10 years
research grands for orphan drug development
lowered marketing costs
tax credits
waived FDA fees
shorter development timelines/quicker approval
legislation
orphan drugs follow the same regulatory pathway as other
pharmaceutical products
testing focuses on pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics, dosing, stability, safety and
efficacy
some statistical burdens are lessened in an effort to maintain development momentum
e.g. orphan drug regulations acknowledge the fact that it may not be
possible to test 1000 patients in a phase III clinical trial, as very few
people may have the disease
many governments introduced legislation to push orphan drug research forward and to
encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop drugs that have a small market
based on ethical principle that those with rare diseases have an equal right to treatment as those with common diseases
The Orphan Drug Act
passed in USA in 1983
states that any drug developed to treat an orphan disease can have 7 years on the market without competition
In 1999 EU adopted similar legislation allowing market exclusivity for up to 10 years for orphan drugs
before this legislation 8 Orphan drugs in EU and 10 in USA approved
since legislation adoption, 70 and 403 orphan drugs approved in EU and USA respectively
Franco, 2013, Drug discovery today
"The Economic Power of Orphan Drugs",
Drug Discovery Today
highlighted that orphan drugs have the potential to outperform non-orphan drugs
premium costs
rapid growth rate of approved orphan drugs
the orphan drug market provides a good opportunity for growth and success
in light of recent legislation and the pharma industry's requirement to research these drugs
over 7000 rare disease and only a small number of these have approved treatments
Matthew Turner, at the World Drug Congress, 2012, gave 10
reasons why pharma companies are starting to research in this area
1. global market worth of rare disease drug development is approaching 75 billion euro
2. of the 700 catalogued rare diseases, fewer than 5% have drug therapies available
3. There are almost 600 orphan drugs in development
4. biologic drugs presently account for over 65% of the orphan and rare disease market
5. Orphan drugs have better odds of approval with an 82% success rate as opposed to 35% for traditional drugs
6. 85% of orphan products are initially developed by small pharma/biotechs
7. Orphan drug approvals in Europe are becoming less evenly split between large pharma and small biotechs - big players are entering market and collaborations are being made with patient groups
8. licensing deals are still seen as the most common deal type fro Pharma to gain access to orphan drugs
9. There are 3 commercialisation strategies to maximise orphan drug sales
A non-orphan drug secures an orphan indication
Topamax, initially indicated for epilepsy, extended patent
protection through the additional orphan indication for
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, a severe form of epilepsy
A pureplay orphan drug
Gleevec, currently licensed for two orphan cancers, is
effective in at least four other rare diseases
Indication expansion into non-orphan indications
Remicade was initially launched for the orphan
indication of Crohn's disease before receiving approval
for the much larger Rheumatoid arthritis market
10. 10 years - the amount of market exclusivity awarded to an orphan drug after EU approval is granted
Cystic Fibrosis
classified as an orphan disease
even though it is one of the most common autosomal
recessive diseases in Caucasians (~1/2,500 births,
1/1,500 in Ireland) due to its heterogeneity.
caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane
conductance regulator (CFTR) gene
regulates fluid flow within cells and affects
components of sweat, digestive fluids, and mucus.
genetic defects underlying CF disrupt the
functioning of several organs
cause ducts or other organs to become clogged
by thick, sticky mucus or other secretions
clogging and infection of the bronchial passages impedes breathing.
Infections progressively destroy the lungs
Plugging of small bile ducts impedes digestion and disrupts liver function in 5% of patients
occlusion of ducts prevents the pancreas from delivering critical enzymes to the bowel in 85% of patients
Absence of the vas deferens renders 95% of males infertile
females are occasionally made infertile by a dense plug of mucus that blocks sperm from entering the uterus
diagnostics
Lack of a CFTR chloride channel in the
sweat duct blocks salt reabsorption
its elevated concentration in sweat is
diagnostic of the disease
CF patients have an elevated nasal
potential difference (NPD) due to increased
luminal sodium absorption
mutations
over 850 known mutations in the CFTR gene that cause CF
delF508 is the most common, >50% of cases
no cure for CF
however mean age of survival has increased with earlier diagnosis
current treatments involve
nutrient repletion by a change in diet and pancreatic enzyme supplements
relief of airway obstruction by postural drainage
treatment of airway infection through oral and intravenous antibiotics
suppression of inflammation using steroids or high dose ibuprofen
none of these treatments are disease modifying
need for medicine to treat the infection aggressively and prevent p. aeruginosa
- an opportunistic infection that causes severe pneumonia in CF patients
needs to be an increase in knowledge of mutant allele-associated phenotypes
linked to science of intracellular trafficking of CFTR
needs to be HTS performed to identify small molecule correctors
G551D mutation
affects 4% of CF patients
glycine replaced with aspartic acid
characterised by a dysfunctional CFTR protein on the cell surface
protein is trafficked to the correct area, the epithelial surface, but
once there the protein cannot transport chloride through the channel
targeted by new orphan drug
Ivacaftor (Kalydeco, Vertex Pharmaceuticals - approved in 2012)
a CFTR potentiator
improves transport of chloride through the ion channel by binding to the
channels directly to induce a non-conventional mode of gating whihc in
turn increases the probability that the channel is open
oral efficacy examined in a randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, international trial on 161 CF patients with at least
one G551D allele (83 given Kalydeco, 78 given placebo)
Ramsey et al, 2011, N Eng J Med
v positive results
FEV1 was improved by over 10 percentage points in active vs placebo
subjects receiving Kalydeco were 55% less likely to have a pulmonary exacerbation that placebo
patients taking Kalydeco had improved lung function after 2 weeks which lasted for 48 weeks
they gained weight, and showed an improvement in patient reported respiratory symptoms and sweat chloride levels
costs ~294,000 dollars for a years supply.
Vertex have said that they would make the drug available free to patients in the US
with no insurance and a household income of under 150,000 dollars
also currently being evaluated for other CF mutations including delF508