The plot holes throughout
the narrative such as Scottie
blindly falling for Elster’s
plan despite being a
detective seemed to take
meaning and significance
away from the film. After
researching Hitchcock and
the text itself further, my
initial response was changed
because of a particular
critical debate...
Hitchcock’s ‘Vertigo’ is in
fact a film about film
itself, constructed by
Hitchcock to specifically
demonstrate this. Aspects
of the film that, without
this knowledge, may at
first seem confusing are
implemented by
Hitchcock to further show
this.
Hitchcock uses his characters to mimic
the ways that filmmakers work with Gavin
Elster creating a narrative and directing
Madeleine and Scottie to carry out his
wishes. Madeleine ‘acts’ and plays a
character that was created by Elster. Later
in the narrative, Scottie does the same by
constructing Judy to look exactly as
Madeleine did down to the smallest
details including changing her hair colour
and wearing a specific outfit.
This debate has definitely altered my initial
response to the film by allowing me to gain
a deeper understanding of the films
meaning and why certain aspects were
included that at first seemed nonsensical.
The film serves as Hitchcocks own
commentary on the medium of film. As well
as this, Hitchocks status as an auteur has
assisted me further appreciating the film as
Hitchcocks fantasy.
. Hitchcock was passionate about
using blonde women as his leads
going as far to say that “Blondes
make great victims, they are like
virgin snow”, Scottie shows this by
forcing Judy to dye her hair from
brown to blonde. This displays
obsession just as Hitchcock, known
to be a perfectionist, obsessed over
the smallest details of his
productions including his actresses.
This links to Auteur theory,
Hitchcock being one of if
not the most respected
Auteur of this time. He
possessed and
demonstrated his own
personal style in all of his
films, ‘Vertigo’ being a film
in which he is
self-reflexive, consciously
including elements that
comment on the medium
of film itself.
One of the main debates which
has risen from the film is that
Vertigo is a film about a film.
This supports that idea that
Vertigo is a film created by a
man for men in the way that
you are able to compare Elster
and Scottie to the role of a
director. This is because they
both construct Judy into the
role of Madeline.
Elster can also be
compared to Hitchcock
in how he has
fabricated a story for
Scottie in order to
manipulate him, similar
to his Hitchcock
constructs his leading
ladies and the film itself
for a male audience.
Critical Reception: Vertigo was considered ‘low’
art when it was first released when compared
to what was considered to be ‘high’ art which, at
the time in film was the genre of noir. However
over time due to Hitchcock’s unique cinematic
style leading to him becoming an auteur, his
films, Vertigo included, are in contemporary
critical circles regarded as high art.
In 1958 when the film was first released, the themes
presented in Vertigo caused critics to write negative
reviews. One such point of critical reviewing was the fact
there were many plot holes in the film, which made it
confusing to understand some of the plot points. However
now because now Hitchcock’s canon of work is considered
high art, Vertigo is now praised for leaving plot holes,
causing debate and discussion amongst audiences.
The use of locations created a Hollywood
cinematic style that a mainstream audience
responded well to. For example when
Madeleine is at the Golden Gate Bridge, this
immediately presents a recognisable iconic
place, San Francisco’ that placed audiences
in a familiar location. In addition to this, the
use of locations became successful to an
international audience as it may have been
the first time they may have seen the iconic
structure that is the Golden Gate Bridge.
Nowadays, the use of
location it has become
clichéd and more
insignificant than other
aspects of the film
because the location is
used in a plethora of
movies of multiple genres.
One of the main debates that was discussed
in early receptions of Vertigo was the use of
objectification of women. When Scotties takes
Madeleine back to his apartment after saving
her, it is implied that he has undressed her
and this implication is never proved nor
disproved however due to the fact that she
was unconscious and in the next scene she
woke up with no clothes on, we know that
Scottie has seen her naked.
This objectification caused
shock and offense when
audiences watched the film for
the first time back in the 50s as
sexual desire was taboo and
not covered in mass media,
however mass media has
desensitised audiences
therefore there is less shock
when watching the film
nowadays.
Madeleine and Judy’s split of personalities provided questions and
debates among critics, both then and now. This debate is still contested
to this day, whether during initial release and reception and
contemporary analytical study. It presents a valuable juxtaposition
within female, in this case Madeleine’s, identity.
This juxtaposition is the split between a physical
and exterior personality which Judy presents which
turns out to be false and only to achieve the
affections of Scotty. The contrasting interior and
true face of Madeleine is only presented once she
becomes comfortable enough with scotty to show
her true identity however Scotty counteracts this by
forcing her to reprise the exterior and false
character, to make her desirable to a man thus
perpetuating the critical approach of the male gaze,
a theory created by Laura Mulvey.
The film subverted tradition genre
conventions. When Judy has transitioned
into Madeleine and Scottie kisses her, the
audience are confused as to whether the
scene reflects a romance or horror genre
as it’s presented as necrophilia.
At the time of release films were
usually one genre, Vertigo goes
against this by representing many
genres such as psychological
thriller, romance and crime thriller.
It has changed from a ‘low’ art form to
a ‘high’ art form and audiences have
recognised this through retrospective
positive reviews and awards.
Vertigo’s narrative structure also subverts traditional
conventions, especially with regard to structure. It goes
against Todorov’s five act structure as it starts with a
disequilibrium (the rooftop chase scene). This would be a very
alien concept to audiences, especially those expecting a
traditional Hollywood narrative and when this expectation is
not fulfilled the initial response was largely negative.
Over time, as Hitchcock’s style has
been developed and studied, a
pattern of structure has been
identified and now instead of
being a subversion of film
conventions it is now an
inspiration to film makers.
Vertigo’s critical
reception has
developed since its
initial release due
to further study as
Hitchcock as an
auteur; changing
his subversions
into innovations.