8260387
Descrição
FlashCards por Clark Bradley, atualizado more than 1 year ago
|
Criado por Clark Bradley
mais de 7 anos atrás
|
|
| Questão | Responda |
| Morris (1983) | D switched labels on a drink, HofL said he had assumed owners rights |
| Pitham and Hehl (1977) | D tried to sell a prisoners belongings, by trying this be assumed owners rights |
| Gomez (1993) | D persuaded his manager to accept cheques he knew was stolen. This was still appropriation as he did would not have consented. |
| Hinks (2000) | Golddigger, a gift can still be an appropriation. |
| Kelly and Lindsay (1998) | Dead bodies are only property sometimes. |
| Oxford v Moss (1979) | Knowledge can not be property. |
| Turner (1971) | Someone in control of something has possession. |
| Woodman (1974) | Even if V doesn't know about the property, it can still belong to them. |
| Davide v Bunnett (1984) | Money still belongs to flatmates when it should be used for a specific purpose. |
| Hall (1972) | No obligation to deal with it in a certain way. |
| AG Reference #1 (1985) | An accidental overpayment still belongs to V. |
| Small (1987) | D not guilty as genuinely believed the owner could not be found. |
| Velumyl (1989) | D intended to deprive of the actual bank notes, not the value. |
| DPP v Lavender (1994) | D dealt with three property regardless of the other's rights. |
| Lloyd (1985) | D didn't intend to permanently deprive or change its state. |
| Easom (1971) | Conditional intent is not enough for theft. |
Quer criar seus próprios Flashcards gratuitos com GoConqr? Saiba mais.