These are the costs or benefits that use of a technology creates for a third party
Consider, for example, the 2008 Glastonbury Festival. Tickets cost £155, the proceeds being used to pay for the bands, the
portaloos, rent for the land and all the other costs. However if you do not want to pay £155 you might be able to hear the bands
for free by standing nearby (positive externality). If you live close by, you might hear the bands even though you do not want to
(negative externality). Local residents are not compensated for noise pollution, and therefore not all the 'costs' are paid for.
Pollution sink
Many technologies which we use on
an everyday basis produce these
externalities which are unaccounted for
The largest of these
is the carbon dioxide
we produce when
burning fossil fuels
to heat our homes,
drive our cars and
make our
consumber goods.
This is released into the atmosphere, which we treat as large pollution sinks
For decades it was assumed that this sink was large enough to cope
Only recently have people begun to realise that there may be significant costs to the pollution they produce
The WWF living planet index
(LPI) has tracked the health of
1,313 terrestrial, marine and
freshwater vertebrate species
since 1970. It shows a significant
decline in planet health
The LPI suggests that using the environment as a sink for pollution has serious consequences which
humanity needs to address
Polluter pays
One way of accounting for the pollution which
is a negative externality of the use of technology
is to implement the polluter pays principle
This approach quantifies the cost of
pollution and passes it back to the
producer, or user, of a technology
In Europe, PPP has gradually
been applied to cars, perhaps
our most pervasive technology
and one of the biggest polluters
However, while PPP might reduce pollution, it does not prevent it
There is evidence in the
UK that variable vehicle
excise duty 'road tax' and
higher fuel prices have
encouraged people to buy
less polluting cars
Nevertheless,
carbon dioxide
levels have
remained high
Transport's contribution
to EU carbon emissions
rose from 21% to 28%
between 1990 and 2004
The EU is proposing that car manufactures be force the
average emissions of new cars to 130 g km -1 by 2012
This would be relatively easy for producers who make many small cars, but much
harder for manufacturers of large, luxury vehicles such as BMW and Mercedes
Capturing pollutants
Road transport produces highly diffuse pollutants
Reducing emissions is more realistic
approach than trying to prevent them
For large. single-point polluters, such as power stations fuelled by coal and gas, it may be realistic to capture and store pollutants before they enter the atmosphere
Flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) and selective catalytic reduction have been used to remove the sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides - a cause of acid rain - from power station emissions
Attention has recently turned to removing carbon dioxide
emissions by using carbon capture and storage technology
CCS is a
current
technology
Norway's Statoil has geosequestered around 1 million
tonnes of carbon dioxide per year into the sleipner gas field
In Weyburn, Canada, carbon dioxide from coal gasification plants in the USA will be used for enhanced oil recovery