(6)Labour government: Devaluation
and recovery, Divisions with the
Conservative and the Labour Party
Descrição
A level British History (Labour, Wilson 1964-70) Mapa Mental sobre (6)Labour government: Devaluation
and recovery, Divisions with the
Conservative and the Labour Party, criado por Marcus Danvers em 05-03-2014.
(6)Labour government: Devaluation
and recovery, Divisions with the
Conservative and the Labour Party
Economic background
After the 1966 GE, the government was now
staggering from one crisis to another as it wrestled
with intractable problems of the British economy.
A fresh sterling crisis developed, some in the
cabinet accept the inevitable and devalue and use
the fall in sterling as an opportunity to boost export
Wilson was against devaluation,
he was determined to fight on with
the poound pegged at $2.80
The initial cause of this latest crisies was
a strike by seamen, which hit exports
To defend sterling, a savage
deflationary package was
pushed through in July.
Bank rate were raisted
Government
spending was cut
Restrictions were placed on
hire purchase
Various tax increases were
announced and a £50-limit placed
as a foreign travel allowance
To control inflation
A Statutory Prices and Incomes
Bill was passed,
There was also a
one-year freeze on wage
and price increases
The result of the
Package
National plan ended
DEA was wound up
Sterling received a
temporary reprieve and the
$2.80 rate was held briefly
George Brown resign then
moved to Foreign Secretary
November 1967 - Devaluation
The cause of
devaluation
A combination of circumstances determined the timing
but the root cause was the overvaluation of a currency
whose economy was doing less well than its competitors
The outbreak of the Arab-Israeli War in June
closed the Suez Canal and harmed British
trade, but additional harm was done by a series
of dock strikes in London and Merseyside
October 1967 saw the worst monthly
trade deficit in British History
Across the world, dealers were selling sterling. The
bank rate was raised to a crisis 16%. A key treasury
adviser, persuaded first Callaghan, and finally Wilson
that sterling would have to be devalued by 14%
The result
It was resduec to $2.40. As always
Wilson was determined to put a
brave face and make the best of it
Callaghan resigned as Chancellor at
the end of the month and did a stright
swap of jobs with Roy Jenkins
Jenkins was determined to tackle the
balance of payments issue and return
the national accounts to the black
The result was a period of stringent
budgets not unlike those of Stafford Cripps
Governmment spending was cut
and reforms like the raising of
school leaving age postponed
Taxation was raised to try and cut down
the national propensity to consume
imports the counrty could not really afford
The sonsumer found that petrol, cigarettes and drink
were all cost more and currenct restrictions meant
foreign travel became even more difficult to undertake
For a time it seemed to not be
working and more plans for further
devalutions was drawn up.
However, by autumn of 1969, an
upswing in world trade began, a balance
of payments surplus was recorded
Conservative Party
The new leader
The new leader in 1965 was
Edward Heath, openly elected
by all Conservative MP
Heath came form a similar social background as Wilson, had been born in the same
year 1916, and had attended a grammar school and then Oxford. Macmillan had
promoted him to the Cabinet and placed him in charge of Britian's bid to enter the EEC
Health, in contrast to Wilson, was a seriously committed
"European", often stiff and unrelaxed, unmarried and
came across as humourless and unfriendly.
In the Commons Wilson run rings a round him. Health was a very
private person, first-class musician and yachtsman - in this sense
diffrent for Wilson, who had few interests outside politics.
Consensus Politics
Despite the differences in personality, the two
leader shared the "consensus politics" that
marked British political life in these years.
Health was sypathetic to the unions and had a notably good
relationship with the new leader of the TGWU Jack Jones.
He was likely to give his polices a more free market
spin, such as the associated with the Selsdon Park
conference in 1970, compared to Labour
It was a meeting with his shadow Cabinet. The
Communique issued afterwards gave the impression
of a shif tto the right in Conservative thinking
He essentially believed in the welfare state
and government management of the
economy to deliver full employment
Division in the
Conservative Party
Enoch Powell
Powell was beginning to question "consensus politics"
and had resigned from his position in the Treasury in
1958 in protest against increased public spending
He became an increasingly vociferous
critic of the role of government in
managing the economy
He opposed nationisation, prices and income
policies and seemed to becoming a supporter
of an unfettered free market.
The only role for the
government was to control the
supply of money and its own
spending
Maulding (Heath opponent
for the leadership)
Maudlign was even more centrist and "liberal"
than Heath, opposing view to Powell
Labour Party
Divisions with in the
Labour Party
George Brown
Possibly his most hostile colleague was the Labour Deputy
Leader, George Brown who was deeply resentful of Wilson.
Brown was an extraordinary individual
He had come through the trade
unions, unlike most of the Cabinet
who had come from Universitys
However, all recognised his powerful mind
and personality and his very series defects
(many alcohol)
DEA - Treasury
The Department for Economic Affairs was headed up by George
Brown. It was nick named by the Treasury as the Department for
Extraordinary Aggression, this illustrates the leave of institutional
rivalry
George Brown resign from the DEA in 1966,
it lingered on for a time but was wound up
Union Refrom
A Bitter struggle, in the Cabinet, which ended on the defeat of Castle and Wilson
over the White Paper. Callaghan took the lead within the Cabinet in stopping the
Bill. Jenkins, an initial supporter, wavered and ran up the white flag
Devaluation
Wilson, Brwon and Callaghan set their face against
devaluation, fear the political consequences. They
then were persuaded to devalue the pound in 1967