Question 1
Question
Which approach did Piaget (1936, 1953) subscribe to?
Answer
-
Constructivism
-
Behaviourism
-
Evolutionary
-
Biological
-
Sociological
Question 2
Question
When, according to Piaget (1936, 1953), do the first signs of object permanence appear in infants?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 3
Question
According to Piaget's substages, when will an infant lift the cloth to search for a hidden toy?
Answer
-
Before 6 - 7 months
-
6 - 7 months
-
8 - 9 months
Question 4
Question
For Piaget, infants tend to consistently make the A-not-B error because they do not have a full understanding of object permanence yet. Is this true or false?
Question 5
Question
Identify one key criticism that can explain why infants consistently make the A-not-B error.
Answer
-
Ancillary deficits (e.g. attention, motor cortices, cognition)
-
Not yet developed full intelligence
-
Lack of self-confidence
-
Lack of resources
Question 6
Question
Invisible displacement is when objects are removed from the view of infants when they are not paying attention. This is often used to test their competency in object permanence and does not fully develop until substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old). Is this true or false?
Question 7
Question
According to Piaget's substages, infants obtain full understanding of object permanence when infants can:
Answer
-
Understand invisible displacement
-
Can complete accurate A-B searching
-
Can represent stationary objects
-
At 12 months old
-
Understand both invisible displacement and mental representations
Question 8
Question
According to Kellman and Spelke (1983), object permanence research that uses occlusion only works when:
Question 9
Question
The findings from Kellman and Spelke's (1983) experiment did little to challenge Piaget's substages. True or false?
Question 10
Question
The Kellman and Spelke (1983) experiment challenge which theory?
Answer
-
Constructivism
-
Nativism
-
Behaviourism
-
All of them
-
None of them
Question 11
Question
Baillargeon (1985, 1987) found that object permanence exists in before infants are 6 months old. True or false?
Question 12
Question
In Baillargeon's (1985, 1987) research, where was the focus of the infants predicated on?
Answer
-
The possible or control event (112 degrees)
-
The impossible event (180 degrees)
-
Neither, it was something else
-
She didn't talk about it
-
None of the above
Question 13
Question
Bogartz, Shinsky and Shilling (2000) countered Aguiar and Baillargeon's (1999) findings, by:
Answer
-
Questioning whether infants had object permanence, it was something else (e.g. novelty)
-
Questioning the ethics of the experiment
-
Questioning the ERPs of the infants when observing both the habituation and test phases
-
All of the above
-
They didn't actually question the research
Question 14
Question
Ruffman, Redman, and Slade (2005) investigated the anticipatory looking action done by infants when observing object permanence.
It counterargued Bogartz, Shinsky and Shilling's (2000) understanding of previous research into object permanence at less than 6 months old.
They argued that:
Answer
-
Infants must anticipate what will happen next based on their (limited) understanding, so it cannot be novelty
-
Infants have the motor cognitions pre-birth to understand the basics of object permanence
-
Infants are a lot more understanding of concepts at a younger age than a lot of research tends to argue
-
They didn't argue
Question 15
Question
Ahmed and Ruffman (1998) investigated why infants make A-not-B errors in search tasks, but show memory for hidden object locations in non-search tasks. According to the findings, where were the infants' attention placed the most?
Question 16
Question
What could be drawn from Ahmed and Ruffman's (1998) findings on the A-not-B search/non-search experiment?
Answer
-
Infants show some memory understanding of previous object locations
-
Infants still do not show memory understanding of previous object locations
-
Infants cannot infer where an object has previously been
-
The results were inconclusive
Question 17
Question
Some believe that infants do have an understanding of object permanence, however, other variables are too overpowering - such as ancillary deficits (e.g. memory, inhibition, means-end reasoning) - for it to be effective.
True or false?
Question 18
Question
Some believe that infants don't have understanding of object permanence, only partial. Looking and reaching activate two separate understandings of knowledge (explicit and implicit). Is this true or false?
Question 19
Question
According to Munakta (1998), the concept of object permanence and graded representation comes in stages and becomes stronger as infants grow older. Is this true or false?
Question 20
Question
There is evidence to suggest that object permanence is innate. Is this true or false?
Question 21
Question
There is evidence to suggest that Piaget's theories on object permanence start earlier than he thought. Is this true or false?
Question 22
Question
According to the theoretical position that infants do not fully grasp object permanence, looking is:
Question 23
Question
For infants, what is mental representation?
Answer
-
When they can arrive at solutions to problems rather than through trial-and-error
-
When they can mentally represent the issues in front of them or away from the stimulus
-
When they can mentally represent their models (e.g. parents) away from the stimuli
-
All of the above
-
None of the above
Question 24
Question
For infants, what is deferred imitation?
Answer
-
When they expect others to imitate their actions
-
When they can remember and repeat the behaviours of others when not present
-
When they attempt to use their own behaviour and represent them in toys that they have
-
All of the above
-
None of the above
Question 25
Question
Deferred imitation is shown to be present in babies:
Answer
-
Less than 2 months old
-
At 4 months old
-
At 6 months old
-
At 8 months old
-
At 12 months old
Question 26
Question
For infants, analogical problem solving is:
Answer
-
When they apply a solution for one problem to a number of others
-
When they apply a solution for a number of problems to one in particular
-
When they cannot apply a solution for one problem to a number of others
-
When they cannot apply a solution for a number of problems to one in particular
Question 27
Question
For infants, displaced reference is:
Answer
-
Using words to cue images of objects not present
-
Using actions to cue images of objects that are not present
-
Using the environment to cue images of objects that are not present
-
All of the above
-
None of the above
Question 28
Question
For infants, goal-oriented or intentional behaviour appears at:
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years)
Question 29
Question
When Piaget hid a toy behind a transparent cover, the infant (between 8 - 12 months old) pushed away his hand to reveal it again. This showed that infants at Substage 4 have understood:
Question 30
Question
It can be argued that violation-of-expectation fully examples that infants consciously understand object displacement and permanence, both with looking and reaching. Is this true or false?
Question 31
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies begin to examine their own reflexes?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 32
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies begin to use simple motor habits that are centered around the infant's own body?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 33
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies now start to aim at repeating interesting effects of their actions in the surrounding world (eg, familiar behaviours)?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 34
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies now learn intentional - or goal-directed - behaviour, as well as obtain initial understandings of object permanence?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 35
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies begin to explore the properties of objects by acting in novel ways, imitate novel behaviours, and are able to search in several locations for a hidden object (accurate A-B searching)?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1- 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 36
Question
At what sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do newborn babies now have internal depictions of objects and events (eg, mental representations) when problem-solving, fully understand invisible displacement, deferred imitation, and make-believe play?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 37
Question
A circular reaction is that - circular - because:
Question 38
Question
According to Kaye and Marcus (1981), are infants able to adapt flexibly and quickly enough to imitate novel behaviours?
Question 39
Question
For infants, object permanence is the understanding that:
Question 40
Question
At which sensorimotor substage (Piaget, 1936, 1953) do infants begin to better anticipate future events (eg, seeing their mother putting on their coat and begging them not to leave)?
Answer
-
Substage 1 (birth - 1 month old)
-
Substage 2 (1 - 4 months old)
-
Substage 3 (4 - 8 months old)
-
Substage 4 (8 - 12 months old)
-
Substage 5 (12 - 18 months old)
-
Substage 6 (18 months - 2 years old)
Question 41
Question
What is make-believe play?
Question 42
Question
For a purely perceptual organism that has no cognition, an object would:
Question 43
Question
Understanding of an object's continued existence requires what?
Answer
-
Time and space
-
Only time
-
Only space
Question 44
Question
According to Piaget and constructivism, errors in A-B searching show:
Answer
-
Deficits in knowledge
-
Functional impairment
-
Genetic deficiencies
Question 45
Question
For Piaget, babies make errors in object permanence because of knowledge deficits. What does it use?
Answer
-
Gradual construction
-
Innate programming
Question 46
Question
For some others, babies may have full understanding, however, things get in the way. For example, Diamond (1985) suggested it to be memory-based. Butterworth (1975) found that:
Question 47
Question
Diamond (1985) suggested that understanding comes from inhibition or habit. Horobin and Arcedolo (1986) found that there were:
Question 48
Question
At what stage can babies; accurately search A-B, represent objects when they are invisible (when they are stationary, but not when both invisible and moving), but not handle invisible displacements?
Answer
-
12-18 months
-
18-24 months
Question 49
Question
At what stage can babies; handle invisible displacements, represent rather than perceive, and handle full object permanence?
Answer
-
12-18 months
-
18-24 months
Question 50
Question
________ is a technique used to dishabituate individuals (primarily children) by going against what they thought was going to happen.
Question 51
Question
According to Kellman and Spelke (1983), reaching under an occluder...
Question 52
Question
Kellman and Spelke (1983) found that their results:
Answer
-
Criticised Piaget's time scale, because 4-month-olds can do the task as well
-
Supported the Piaget findings
Question 53
Question
Kellman and Spelke's (1983) findings were:
Question 54
Question
Subsequent findings on what Kellman and Spelke (1983) found that:
Answer
-
Children do not fill in the object, only perceive it
-
Children can perceive the rod as well to be filled (Gestalt)
Question 55
Question
According to subsequent research into the Kellman and Spelke (1983) findings, do children look at the rod more or everything else around it?
Question 56
Question
The Baillargeon (1985, 1987) findings supported or criticised the Piaget stance on object permanence?
Answer
-
Evidence of object permanence, one cannot pass through another
-
Not evidence for object permanence, needs more research
Question 57
Question
The effects for total occlusion in the Aguiar and Baillargeon (1999) study showed it to be apparent at what age?
Answer
-
1 month
-
2 months
-
2.5 months
Question 58
Question
According to Ruffman, Slade, and Redman (2005), infants:
Question 59
Question
In ancillary deficits, means-end reasoning refers to:
Answer
-
Having to logically reason how to get to an object
-
Searching but getting distracted
-
Looking is recognition-based, searching is recall-based (and more difficult)
-
Previous search task may still be ongoing
Question 60
Question
In ancillary deficits, attention refers to:
Answer
-
Having to logically reason how to get to an object
-
Searching, but also becoming distracted
-
Looking is recognition-based, searching is recall-based (and more difficult)
-
Previous searching may still be ongoing
Question 61
Question
In ancillary deficits, memory refers to:
Answer
-
Having to logically reason how to get to an object
-
Searching, but also becoming distracted
-
Looking is recognition-based, searching is recall-based (and more difficult)
-
Previous task searching may still be ongoing
Question 62
Question
In ancillary deficits, inhibition refers to:
Answer
-
Having to logically reason where an object could be
-
Becoming distracted by searching
-
Looking is recognition-based, searching is recall-based (and more difficult)
-
Previous task search may still be ongoing
Question 63
Question
Graded representation refers to:
Question 64
Question
For whom does understanding become 'fuller'?
Question 65
Question
For whom does understanding become 'stronger'?
Question 66
Question
Berk (2012) suggested that babies still make the accurate A-B search error when:
Answer
-
They search in A, watch it go to B, but still look in A anyway
-
They search in A, watch it go to B, and follow it to B
Question 67
Question
"...enables toddlers to solve advanced object permanence problems involving invisible displacement - finding a toy moved while out of sight, such as into a small box while under a cover" Berk (2012). What is this an understanding of?
Answer
-
Mental representation
-
Graded representation
Question 68
Question
In which temporal lobe did infants display a particular brain-wave pattern that is also seen in adults when they sustain a mental image of an object?
Answer
-
Right temporal lobe
-
Left temporal lobe