Zusammenfassung der Ressource
NATURAL SELECTION, ADAPTATION
AND MICROEVOLUTION
- 1) STUDYING ADAPTATION
- why do organisms
live the way they do?
- how has past evo shaped
a trait or an orgnsm?
- why can't nat sel. fashion
perfect orgnsm?
Anmerkungen:
- correlated traits
mutation allele
lack of variation, can't change
- 5) LIFE HISTORY EVO BY NAT SEL
- LH traits can evolve
rapidly
- The factors driving evo can be
tested
- Translocation exp- guppy
- guppy popn in low and high predation
area
- *selection can act on
multiple co-adapted traits
- *the adaptiveness of traits &
the drivers of evo can be tested
- * adapted traits are subjected to ongoing
natural selection as environmental
conditions change & continue to evolve
- Microevolution can lead to
appreciable change that occurs
rapidly on ecological timescales
- 2) ADAPTIVE TRADE-OFFS
- if fitness is abt survival &
reproduction? why can't they
continuously produce high quality
offspring and live forever?
- some orgnsm close to perfect, but
only SOME of the traits (e.g.thrips
egg mite, brown kiwi)
- a) time & E an orgnsm can
harvest is finite
- b) biological processes
take time
- c) fundamental trade-offs in the set of traits.
- d) increase fitness in one
trait can reduce a fitness of
another trait
- 3) ADAPTATION & THE
EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES
- 1) An evolutionary strategy
- a set of co-adapted traits which
allow an organism to survive &
adapt to their ecological niche
- 2) Life history strategy (LHS)
- an orgnsm's investment
in growth, maturation,
reproduction, survival
- 4) LIFE HISTORY STRATEGIES
Anmerkungen:
- LH traits are associated w fitness and are polygenic traits
- Key qs in LH analysis
- Why live as
long as they do?
- Why some reproduce once
and others have many
reproductive attempts during
their lifespan?
- Why vary in
the number of offspring they
produce?
- Why vary in the time
they take to become
sexually mature?
- 1) Trade-offs:
Fecundity vs
Lifespan
- e.g. rotifiers
- - produced lots of young,
early in their life – had a
shorter life
- - produced less young per
day, lived longer and produced
more young over their lifespan
- * High reproduction on
one day decreases
chances of survival to the
next day
- * Reproduction
is deleterious to
future survival
- Trade-offs: Current vs future reproduction
- e.g. Meadow grass
- the number of inflorescences
per plant - produced in the 1st
year or 2nd yr
- produce more in 1st yr,
produce less in its 2nd yr
- e.g. collared
flycatchers
Ficedula albicollis
- some produce young in first yr,
smaller clutch size, but their lifetime
reproductive succesful is higher
- increase clutch size in the 1st
year, the clutch size
reduces with age
- young that was produced in
bigger clutch size will have less
clutch size itself
- Predictable & unpredictable Env
Anmerkungen:
- 6) MICROEVO AS A SOURCE OF
LARGE SCALE CHANGE
- * genetic drift causes random
changes in allele/traits- popn
can drift in diff directions and
diverge.
- * selection leads to
adaptation to local
conditions, & differences
btwn popn can accumulate
- * Limited gene flow +
drift/selection can cause
popns to diverge
- * Low levels of gene flow help to
maintain diversity & connection of
popns & still allow adaptation to local
conditions, high levels of gene flow
may swap local selection
- RING SP - two reproductively
isolated forms are connected by a
chain of intermediate populations
- Bridge between
microevolution and
speciation/ macroevolution
- Show the history of divergence of 2 sp &
demonstrate how microevolutionary changes can
accumulate into differences btwn sp.
- Show how
geographical
differentiation to the
level of sp can occur
in the face of
ongoing gene flow
- e.g. Siberian Greenish warbler
Phylloscopus trochiloides
- 2 populations that are not
interbreeding - different
morphology and song
- Interbreeding in
intermediate popns
around the ring