Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Goldstein
vs. Rogers
- 1939
- Theory
- James' Theory of Self
- Holistic approach to
patient treatment
- Anxiety comes from
an ill-defined threat
to our existance
- Uses
Self-Actualisation as
single master motive
- Positive view of human
interaction instead of Freudian
negativity
- 1951
- Theory
- Uses 3 master motives:
Self-Acualisation, Positive Regard
and Self Regard
- Therapist should give
unconditional Positive Regard
- Increases Self Regard
- More likely to search for Positive
Regard from others
- Led to measure of
Rosenburg Self-Esteem
Scale
- James' Theory of Self
- Compare
- James' Theory of Self
- Self-Actualisation
- Positive motives and a
move away from Freud
- Practical uses: Holisitic
treatment/Counselling psych
- Contrast
- Goldstein = No measures,
Rogers = Self-Esteem Scale
- Goldstein = 1 master motive,
Rogers = 3 master motives
- Goldstein = Simplistic,
Rogers = Better received
- Goldstein = Revived James' Theory,
Rogers = indirectly but no credited influence