Austins imperative command theory

Description

Jurisprudence Mind Map on Austins imperative command theory, created by crimson on 21/10/2013.
crimson
Mind Map by crimson, updated more than 1 year ago
crimson
Created by crimson about 11 years ago
45
1

Resource summary

Austins imperative command theory
  1. law it is created by a sovereign who is the source of law
    1. illimitable
      1. "de facto" limitations but no "de jure" limitations
      2. indivisble
        1. one body of persons in whom the totality of sovereign power is invested
        2. identifiable
          1. sovereign- person who gets habitual obedience
        3. Addressed by political superior to inferior
          1. command backed by threats
            1. signification of desire where non-compliance followed by sanction
              1. command is separated into particular and General
                1. particular is to one person
                  1. general is addressed to community at large
              2. separates into laws properly so called and improperly so called
                1. laws proerly so called
                  1. divine law and ones by political superior
                    1. political superior
                      1. divine law
                    2. Laws improperly so called
                      1. Laws by analogy and by metaphor
                    3. concerns of appropriateness of law is based on science of legislation
                      1. based on utlilty
                      2. analytical methodology based on inductive method
                        Show full summary Hide full summary

                        Similar

                        CONVENTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS: METHODOLOGY ESSAY
                        yassinr
                        Orders backed by threats
                        Joanna Ip
                        Jurisprudence
                        Kate Fuller
                        Obligations - Jugements
                        Alexandre Blaney
                        Juris Flashcards
                        Joshua Jimenez
                        Aquinas
                        lstaffordsmith
                        Would persons in such a state of nature agree to surrender their freedom to those who ruled them?
                        lstaffordsmith
                        John Finnis
                        lstaffordsmith
                        morality
                        crimson
                        Law as a command
                        crimson