COSTA AND
MCCRAE
(1999,
2003,2008)
NEO-PI-R.
questionnaire
with 5 factors
and 6 facets
each. 5
structure is a
human
universal.
biological basis
DERAAD &
PEABBODY
(2005) said that
E, A, C were
cross-lingual
Bi 5 changes over
development, 7
found in childhood,
therefore 5 + or - 2
EVALUATION
SHELDON - start of
psychometric approach to
personality, surveys, wide
population, applied stats
ALLPORT - uniqueness
of individuals,
self-concept, allport
stresed the limitations
of trait theory,
developed a list of 4500
traits, too long
CATTELL - empirical validity,
reduced ALLPORTS traits, large
samples, broad approach, LOTS
of data, comprehensive,
empirically based
complexity (genetics and
environment) - traits
PREDICT behaviour, 16
p.f. questionnaire
standardised measure now
EYSENCK -
emphasised genetics,
large samples, factor
analysis, historical
samples, cross-cultural
evidence, PEN
translated to other
languages
twin studies concluded genetic
basis, longitudinal traits across
time, socialised into traits,
behavioural, eysenck TOO
PARSIMONIOUS (only 3 traits),
COMPREHENSIVE theory,
heavy focus on genetics
not on social context,
personality determines
contexts we seek out,
theory has APPLIED
VALUE. RIGOROUS
APPROACH, GOOD
DESCRIPTION AND
EXPLANATION AND
HEURISTIC VALUE
FIVE FACTOR MODEL
EVAL - many sources
used to draw conclusion,
Big 5 UNIVERSAL, large
samples, factor
analysed, data then
hypothesis,
data-derived hypothesis
COSTA AND MCCRAE
- NEO-PI-R allows
measurement at general
level, NEO-PI-R
translated into other
languages, traits stable
and genetic basis
OVERALL
TRAIT
EVALUATION -
not 100%
consensus on
big 5, need
scientific
evidence
against big 5.
Big 5 doesn't
measure traits
such as MORAL
/ IMMORAL. if
evaluative traits
were included
we would have
7. trait
approaches
over rely on
trait measures,