null
US
Iniciar Sesión
Regístrate Gratis
Registro
Hemos detectado que no tienes habilitado Javascript en tu navegador. La naturaleza dinámica de nuestro sitio requiere que Javascript esté habilitado para un funcionamiento adecuado. Por favor lee nuestros
términos y condiciones
para más información.
Siguiente
Copiar y Editar
¡Debes iniciar sesión para completar esta acción!
Regístrate gratis
109498
ATTENTION & PERCEPTION
Descripción
Degree with Hons Attention And Perception - DSE 212 Mapa Mental sobre ATTENTION & PERCEPTION, creado por cutiemcpouty el 26/05/2013.
Sin etiquetas
attention and perception
attention and perception - dse 212
degree with hons
Mapa Mental por
cutiemcpouty
, actualizado hace más de 1 año
Más
Menos
Creado por
cutiemcpouty
hace alrededor de 11 años
157
0
0
Resumen del Recurso
ATTENTION & PERCEPTION
SECTION 2 - NATURE OF ATTENTION
PHENOMENON OF CONSCIOUS ATTENTION
EDGAR
EMPHASISES THE SELECTION AND ALLOCATION OF COGNITIVE RESOURCES IN HIS DEFINITION
REFERENCES TO SIMONS AND LEVIN - CHANGE BLINDNESS
SUGGESTS LINKS WITH SOCIAL IDENTITY AS WELL AS PERCEPTION ITSELF
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCH = WHY DO WE TAKE IN SO LITTLE?
ALLOCATION OF ATTENTIONAL RESOURCES
KAHNEMAN
SUGGESTED NETWORK OF BRAIN CELLS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANALYSING INCOMING INFORMATION
ALREADY HELD WITHIN THE LIMITED CENTRAL CAPACITY PROCESSOR
CAPACITY OF PROCESSOR = VARIABLE ACCORDING TO AROUSAL THAT BRAIN EXPERIENCES
HIGH AROUSAL = PROCESSOR IS FUNCTIONING AT MAXIMUM
LOW AROUSAL = MORE RESTRICTED - CHANGE BLINDNESS
IN CONTRAST
MCLEOD
&
MULTIPLE RESOURCES THEORIES GREW FROM MCLEOD
IN RESPONSE TO CENTRAL PROCESSOR THEORIES
POSNER AND BOIES
DUAL TASK STUDIES
BRAIN DOES NOT HAVE ONE CENTRAL PROCESSOR
BECAUSE PEOPLE CAN ATTEND TO MORE THAN ONE ATTENTIONAL TASK AT A TIME
AS LONG AS TASKS ARE FROM DIFFERENT MODALITIES
MODALITIES NOT ESTABLISHED CLEARLY THOUGH
IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTENTION IS REGULATED BY - CENTRAL PROCESSOR + MODALITY-SPECIFIC PROCESSORS
OR
IF THEY ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING??
ATTENTIONAL SPOTLIGHT
USING CENTRAL PROCESSOR MODEL
SECTION 1 - CLARIFICATION/DEFINITION
ATTENTION = PROCESS OF SELECTION
NON SELECTED INFO IS NOT ATTENDED TO
UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTION
TRIESMAN
ATTENTION SWITCHING / COCKTAIL PARTY EFFECT
WHEN OUR NAME IS CALLED AT A PARTY BY SOMEONE YOU WERE NOT FOCUSING ON AND YOU HEAR IT.
SCHNEIDER & SHIFFRIN
DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONTROLLED & AUTOMATIC PROCESSES
AUTOMATIC PROCESSES = MAKE NO DEMANDS ON ATTENTIONAL RESOURCES, DO NOT DRAW ON ATTENTIONAL CAPACITY
OR PROCESSING RESOURCES - HAPPEN WITHOUT CONSCIOUS AWARENESS
UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTIONS DO NOT SEEM TO REQUIRE ATTENTION
SOME OF INFO NOT SELECTED FOR ATTENTION IS PROCESSED OUTSIDE CONSCIOUS AWARENESS
MUCH OF PROCESSING THAT TAKES PLACE DURING CONSCIOUS PERCEPTION ALSO HAPPENS OUT OF CONSCIOUS PERCEPTION
MEMORY PROCESSES
EDGAR
EPISODIC
SPECIFIC EVENTS
HIPPOCAMPUS
SEMANTIC
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE
TEMPORAL CORTEX
SELECTION PROCESS THAT OPERATES BETWEEN WHAT IS SENSED & PERCIEVED
SENSATION -----> ATTENTION ----->PERCEPTION
ESSENTIAL PROCESS WHAT WE SENSE & PERCEIVE
2 KINDS - CONSCIOUS - (INVOLVES ATTENTION)
UNCONSCIOUS - (DOES NOT INVOLVE ATTENTION)
FOR EXTRA MARKS IN EXAM LINK BETWEEN DIFFERENT TOPIC AREAS
ONE CONSTANT = ATTENTIONAL PROCESSES ARE LIMITED IN CAPACITIES
SOME SENSORY INPUT GOES UNATTENDED
SELECTION OCCURS BY -
BROADBENT
IT OCCURS AT EARLY STAGE OF PROCESSING
ON BASIS OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INPUT
SPLIT LIFESPAN EXPERIMENT
TRIESMAN
ATTENTION WOULD BE SWITCHED FROM CURRENT FOCUS
TO DIFFERENT ONE IF SECOND FOCUS IS MEANINGFUL AND SIGNIFICANT TO THE PERSON
IE INFORMATION THAT WAS NOT BEING CONSCIOUSLY ATTENDED TO CAN ATTRACT OUR ATTENTION =
AT SOME LEVEL IS BEING ATTENDED TO
POSSIBILITY OF UNCONSCIOUS ATTENTION
EXTENDED DUE TO TRIESMAN
SCHENIDER & SHRIFFIN
DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONTROLLED (VOLUNTARY) & AUTOMATIC PROCESSES.
AUTOMATIC PROCESSES = ECONOMICAL FOR COGNITIVE RESOURSES
CAN BE HINDERANCE - IF TASK REQUIRES US TO INHIBIT/NULLIFY EFFECTS
EG - STROOP EFFECT
EG = FLANKER COMPATIBILITY EFFECT - LAVIE
SACKS
GATHERING SENSORY INFO & LINKING IT TO STORED KNOWLEDGE
ARE SEPERATE PROCESSES
LINKING SENSORY INFO + STORED KNOWLEDGE = NON ATTENTIONAL PROCESS
& BOTH GATHERING & LINKING ARE ESSENTIAL FOR PERCEPTION
Mostrar resumen completo
Ocultar resumen completo
¿Quieres crear tus propios
Mapas Mentales
gratis
con GoConqr?
Más información
.
Similar
ATTENTION & PERCEPTION CONT
cutiemcpouty
Gramática para practicar el First Certificate I
Diego Santos
Expresiones en inglés
maya velasquez
Advanced English Final Exam (C1)
Paulo Cevallos
Geografía: España y Europa
Diego Santos
Matematicas exanii-ii
Monica Sanchez8667
Mapas Conceptuales con GoConqr
Diego Santos
Mapa mental: Sinónimos y Antónimos
mariela.bolanos
Enlaces Químicos
Camila Barbosa
Unit 1 Test 1
María Jordano de la Torre
METODOLOGÍA DE LA ENSEÑANZA
Francisco Vergara
Explorar la Librería