Chapter 3: Semiotic Approaches to
Material Culture
Nota:
By Silvana Rodarte
Citation Berger, A. A. (2016) What Objects Mean: An
Introduction to Material Culture (2nd ed.). NY, NY: Routledge.
Saussure on Signs
Wrote the book "Course
in General Linguistics"
where he set out
fundamentals of what
he calls semiology.
According to this book,
semiology would show
what constitutes signs,
what laws govern them.
Semiotic studies signs in
society, which means it is a
social science, and explains
what signs are and how they
work.
Definition of signs has two
parts: sound-image and
concept (also mentioned
by him as signifier and
signified).
From Semiotic perspective, objects are signs
(signifiers) and the task of the semiotician is
to figure out their various signifieds.
We find meaning in concepts by
setting up oppositions. Concepts
derive meaning from their
opposites. Keep in mind that
oppositions are not negations.
(Ex: Negation of happy is unhappy
and the opposite of happy is sad).
"Sound-image” becomes an object or
signifier. You must discern what is
signified by the object.
Problems with Interpreting Signs
Sign System- signs with many other signs contained
within them. That sign system contains signifiers. (Ex:
sign system= hat, Signifiers= size/ material of the hat/
etc). Signifieds are all based on convention (Ex: bow
ties= intellectual).
In material culture, these signs can be
body ornaments, clothes, shoes, and
other things. We have to have some
kind of product knowledge and
general knowledge (from media and
ads) to be able to determine how to
interpret an object from a semiotic
perspective.
Peirce on Signs
Other founding father of semiotics and gave it its name.
Suggests that the universe is made up of signs and that
the interpreters of signs have to supply some of the
meanings. "Something which stands
to somebody for something in some respect or capacity.”
Three kinds of signs: iconic signs (resemblance/what you
can see), indexical signs (cause and effect/what you can
determine), and symbolic signs (meaning must be learned/
what you can learn).
Combining Saussure’s and Peirce’s approaches to
semiotics: we can see objects as signifiers that have
signifieds and objects that are iconic, idexical, or
symbolic.
Semiotic approach to material culture involves searching
for the way these objects function as signs and generate
meaning to others. Nothing has meaning in itself.
Meaning comes from a network of relations.
Roland Barthes on Semiotics of
Objects
Wrote "Semiotic Challenge" in 1988. Most known for
"Mythologies" (discusses the way people convert
objects to “pseudo-nature”).
According to Barthes, signify means that objects
carry not only information but also account for
systems of signs (systems of differences,
oppositions, and contrasts). There is no object that
has no meaning.
The problem in studying the meaning of objects is
the obstacle of the obvious. What is the objects
outside of its role in the world? What does an object
mean to someone? (Examples seen in ads and
films).
On the Veracity of Signs
Umberto Eco wrote "A Theory of Semiotics". He
states that semiotics is the discipline studying
everything which can be used in order to lie.
Signs can be used to mislead others.
Lying with signs can be found not
just in objects but also in design
of objects, facial expressions, body
language, and language itself.
We observe material culture in what
people are wearing or using known
as, "people watching".
Denotation and Connotation
Denotation- detailed descriptions and measurements (factual
information). Connotation- the cultural meanings and myths
connected to them (symbols, culture, mythic).
Examples seen with Barbie dolls. Charles Winnick,
"Desexualization in American Life", states the theory that
these dolls have created a change in how young girls
think about motherhood and their relationships to
men.