Created by Emma Day1338
over 8 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Prefrontal lobotomy | Surgical procedure that severs fibres connecting the frontal lobes of the brain from the underlying thalamus |
Heuristics | Mental shortcuts that help us streamline our thinking and make sense of the world |
Naturalistic observation | Watching behaviour in real-world settings |
External validity | Extent to which we can generalise findings to real-world settings |
Internal validity | Extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect inferences from a study |
Case study | Research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often over an extended time period |
Existence proofs | Demonstrations that a given psychological phenomenon can occur |
Correlational design | Research design that examines the extent to which two variables are associated |
Scatterplot | Grouping of plots on a two-dimensional graph in which each dot represents a single persons data |
Illusionary correlations | Perception of a statistical association between two variables where none exist |
Experiment | Research design characterised by random assignment of participants to conditions, and manipulation of an independent variable |
Random assignment | Randomly sorting participants into two groups |
Experimental groups | In an experiment, the group of participants that relieves the manipulation |
Control group | In an experiment, the group of participants that does not receive the manipulations |
Independent variable | Variable that the experimenter manipulates |
Dependent variable | Variable that an experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has had an effect |
Operational definition | A working definition of what the researcher is measuring |
Confound | Any difference between the experimental and control groups other than the independent variable |
Placebo effect | Improvement resulting from the mere expectation of improvement |
Blind | Unaware of whether one is in the experimental group or the control group |
Nocebo effect | Harm resulting from the mere expectation of harm |
Experimenter expectancy effect | Phenomenon on in which researchers' hypotheses lead them to unintentionally bias the outcome of the study |
Double-blind | When neither researchers nor participants are aware of who is in the control group |
Demand characteristics | Cues that participants pick up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding the researcher's hypotheses |
Random selection | Procedure that insures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate |
Reliability | Consistency of measurement |
Validity | Extent to which a measure assesses what it purports to measure |
Response sets | Tendencies of research participants to distort the responses to questionnaire items |
Informed consent | Informing research Participants of what is involved in the study before asking them to participate |
Statistics | Application of mathematics to describing and analysing data |
Descriptive statistics | Numerical characterisations that describe data |
Central tendency | Measure of the 'central' scores in a dataset or with the group tends to cluster |
Mean | Average; a measure of central tendency |
Median | Middle score in a dataset; a measure of central tendency |
Mode | Most frequent score in a dataset; a measure of central tendency |
Dispersion | Measure of how loosely or tightly bunch scores are |
Range | Difference between the highest and lowest scores; a measure of dispersion |
Standard deviation | Measure of desperation that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean |
Inferential statistics | Mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalise findings from our sample to the full population |
Meta-analysis | Investigation of the consistency of patterns of results across large numbers of studies conducted in different laboratories |
File drawer problem | Tendency for negative findings to remain unpublished |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.