New L2 knowledge equal to new behavior;
comes from a model (teacher:expert in the
structural knowledge of L1 and L2)
How do learners learn?
Habit-formation resulting in new associations
between forms and their meanings through
stimulus-response-reinforcement framework;
this involves repetition and pattern practice ad
nauseam; analogy plays a role as well
What is the nature of
their knowledge?
Implicit knowledge (new
responses to stimuli) leading to
automatization of new habits
Systematicity,
Variability, Role
of First
Language
Is systematicity addressed?
No; however, learners from the same L1 background
are expected to commit the same errors
Is variability addressed?
Variability in success can only be attributed to
deficient teaching or insufficient practice
How is the role of the first
language explained?
Through the notion of transfer of L1 habits that
could be positive or negative depending on the
differences and similarities between L1 and L2
Input Exposure
and Role of
Output
Role of output
The more the learner produces (output), the more
opportunities to acquire good habits; learners’
active engagement and output are crucial
Role of input frequency
The more practice of the new patterns, the
easier the formation of new habits
Role of input
Input is essential: this is THE source of
good stimuli; provided by the teacher
Role of
Instruction and
Potential for
More Research
Role of instruction
Essential: need for models and for
immediate and consistent feedback
Pedagogical
implications
Combining the insights from Structural
Linguistics and Behaviorism, gave birth to ALM.
Potential for more research
Debunked by Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s
Language Behavior; however, some of its
principles (associationist learning; frequency
of input) will appear in later theories
Evaluation
Is the theory testable?
The theory was not put to test by the
Behaviorists themselves; first empirical SLA
studies in the 1970s (Error Analyses) did not
support the claims made by Behaviorist
What kind of evidence is
used to test the theory?
Collecting learners’ samples and
examining errors
Conclusion of evidence
Too simplistic a view: there is much more than
repetition and practice involved in SLL; theory
interested in testing learners’ output only