MINORITY
INFLUENCE -
individual or small
group influences
large group
REAL
WORLD
EXAMPLES
SUFFRAGETTE
MOVEMENT -
1920s
GREENPEACE
- 1980s - today
MINORITIES influence the
majority through
behavioural style
(consistency), flexibility and
compromise, style of
thinking and identification
1. CONSISTENCY. -
MOSCOVICI - 1969 - the
most important aspect of
behavioural style is
consistency. all members
should repeadedly and
consistenly state the
same message
MOSCOVICI, LAGE &
NAFFRECHOUX - 1969 - 3
conditions. there is a blue
screen, 4 real pps, 2
confederates, one group say
the slide is always green, the
second group says sometimes
green and control is all real
participants. group one all
conform
CRITIQUE BY
SAMPSON - 1991 -
poor ecological
validity and female
students as
participants
unrepresentative
NEMETH ET AL - 1974 -
variation on the procedure.
condition one, randomly
confederates said slide
was "Green" or
"Blue-Green", condition
two were systematically
said "Green" to brighter
slides and "Blue-Green" to
darker ones. last condition
just said "Green" on all
trials. most influenced
(21%) by the systematic
and consistent condition to
colours (cond 2)
2. FLEXIBILITY AND
COMPROMISE - MUGNY &
PAPSTAMOU - 1980 -
consistency alone is not
sufficient for a minority to
influence the majority. the
consistent minority should be
seen as flexible and
compromising instead of rigid
and uncompromising, then
they have a better chance of
changing the majority
NEMETH - 1987 - MOCK
JURY EXPERIMENT -
compensation for victim of
ski lift accident.
confederate 1 didn't
compromise, confederate 2
compromised with majority
and the majority did the
same
3. STYLE OF
THINKING - PETTY
ET AL - 1994 - need to
think deeply about the
other views being put
forward, so engage in
systematic thinking
and processing
SMITH ET AL - 1996 -
minority should get the
majority to think about
an issue, then they
stand a good chance of
influencing the majority
4. IDENTIFICATION -
people identify with those
similar to themselves, if
identify the majority are
more likely to take the
minority views seriously
MASS ET AL -
1982 - gay minority
arguing for gay
rights had less
influence on a
straight minority
than a straight
minority arguing for
gay rights
UNANIMITY - if one
confederate gives the
correct answer, the
true participant was
less likely to conform
IS MAJORITY AND
MINORITY
INFLUENCE THE
SAME OR
DIFFERENT?
SAME
LATANE AND WOLF - 1981 -
SOCIAL IMPACT THEORY - the
SIT can explain maj and min
through three factors, 1.
STRENGTH OF MESSAGE
(numbers or consistency) 2.
STATUS AND KNOWLEDGE
(one person expert has similar
influence to majority of
non-experts. 3. IMMEDIACY
(closer psychologically or
physically to influencer, greater
the message).
MOSCOVICI & NEMETH - 1974
- argue that a minority of one is
more influential than a minority
of more than one, one person is
more likely to be consistent over
long periods of time
DIFFERENT
MOSCOVICI - 1980 - majority
influence results in
COMPLIANCE (not believing in
private), whereas minority
inlfluence results in
CONVERSION (believing in
private but not acknowledging
in public). MINORITY MAKES
PEOPLE OPEN MINDED,
MAJORITY MAKES PEOPLE
THINK NARROW MINDEDLY
MOSCOVICI - 1980 -
majority based on public
compliance, normative
influence - do what is the
group norm. minority
influence not based on
normative, but based on
informational social
influence, providing the
majority with new ideas
so that they re-examine
their views
MOSCOVICI - 1980 -
DUAL PROCESS
THEORY - MAJORITY =
compliance, social
comparison process,
normative, public
conformity. MINORITY =
conversion, force others
to think more deeply,
private conformity
EVIDENCE - MOSCOVICI &
PERSONNAZ - 1980, 1986 -
accept majority views
passively, minority views
involve cognitive
reconstruction.
BLUE-GREEN EXPERIMENT,
pps publically called out the
colour, then privately wrote
down the colour of the slide.
when confederate absent,
minority influence rose.