magma locking in
earth's magnetic
polarity, used to
reconstruct plate
movement
Hazards: natural events
that threatens/causes
injury & deaths, damage
to property
Disasters: occur
when hazards
have significant
impact on
populations.
hazard becomes
disaster when
100+ die/affect.
Risk = (hazard x exposure x vulnerability)
/ manageability
Risk: exposure of people to hazards.
relates to probability of a hazard leading
to loss of life/lively hood.
difficult to assess, can include:
individual/community perception
unpredictability of
hazard.
people get caught out by timing/magnitude.
lack of
alternatives.
people still live in hazard zones, lack of
options, good farming
benefits of living in area
can out weigh negatives
acceptance of
risk
Vulnerability: how likely a
community/structure is to
suffer from a disaster.
resilience: ability for
community to resist, absor &
recover from a hazard.
Hazard
Profiles
magnitude & intensity
richter
scale
earthquake
0-9
measures height of waves,
absolute scale, will
measure the same
anywhere. 1 on scale =
10X
Mercalli
scale
earthquake
I-XII
different amounts
of shaking, based
on damage &
movement of goods
Moment magnitude scale
earthquake
0-9
describes earthquake in terms of energy
released. based on seismic movement,
calculated by amount of slip in the fault. used
by US Geological Survey for large
earthquakes. 1 on scale = 10X
volcanic explosivity
index
volcanoes
0-8
measured from volume of
products ejected. increase in 1 on
scale = 10X
hazard profiles used to compare
understand the physical
characteristic of hazards
earthquakes,
volcanoes, tsunamis
development &
governance
often correlates to
vulnerability & resilience
economic
development
access to resources,
organisations, technology
higher income leads to
living in safe
locations/hazard proof
areas.
education access
aware of hazards/what to
do
heathcare
access
better
health
resistance to disease
housing
poor
quality
cant withstand
hazards
governance
way a country,
city, community,
company etc is
run
three concepts
authority
decision
making
accountability
good governance
embraces principles
such as rule of law,
transparency, equity,
participation
poor governance
can be corrupt,
weak both
increase
vulnerability
failing to invest in
infrastructure,
warning systems
ill
prepared
stakeholders: individuals, communities,
organisations. governments, businesses
with interest in situation (hazard risk)
geographical factors
population density
urbanisation:
people, goods,
businesses at risk
isolation/inaccessibility: hard to get help
community spirit: boost
moral
contrasting locations
high development
an handle better but
more financial damage
low development
rely on others, less to loose
management of the disasters & hazards
mega disaster
large scale (area involved &
economic, human impact)
huge challenges,
especially at
emergency stage.
substantial
international
aid
no universal
definition for disaster
small events in remote locations
often under/not recorded
disaster, death, damage often under
recorded for political reasons
some parts are at risk of multiple
hazards, locations with 3
overlapping hazards = hazard hot
spot
extremely disaster prone,
more than one type of natural
hazard
predicting
volcanoes have some signs
harder to predict earthquakes
need to detect areas of tectonic stress
management cycle
3. reconstruction
& mitigation
2. initial recovery (rehab)
1. emergency response
5. lesson learned,
implement
remedial actions
4. return to normal
improving preparedness
mitigation & preparedness
preparedness: educating people about
what to do & improving warning
system & equipment
mitigation: action taken
to reduce/eliminate risk
to life & property in
future
often outcome of stage 5 and taken in stage 3
referred to as adaptation
3 basic actions to mitigate the impacts
modifying the hazard event
no tech yet
strengthening coastal
defences
tsunami
diverting/chilling lava flows
increasing slope stability
modifying vulnerability and resilience
improving prediction
forecasting
prediction,
warning
systems,
scientific research,
modern tech gives
better warning
systems.
improving community preparedness
enforcing building codes, especially
public buildings.
changing behaviours, moving
people away from high risk zone
modifying potential financial loss
insurance
insurance need to asses:
level of risk
probability of
certain
magnitude
hazard
market value of
property to be
insured
likely cost of repair &
reconstruction
Disaster aid
often during the emergency/early recovery
donations from
voluntary organisations & charities
e.g. Red Cross
governments to intergovernmental organisations
e.g. UN
often criticised as they can be
inefficient or corrupt, does
not encourage self help and
bottom up management
response
factors affecting response
physical
type of hazard
topography of area
climate
accessability
human
scientific understanding
level of community preparedness
technology/engineering
population density/number involved
education & training
economic wealth
infrastructure
government framework
Parks response curve
used to analyse timeline
between hazard striking
and return to normality
Sendai Framework
1. understand the disaster risk
2. ensure
government
strengthening to
manage hazard
risk
3. invest in improving resilience
and disaster preparedness