8020367
Question 1
Question
Was the contract frustrated in Krell v Henry
Answer
-
Yes
-
No
Question 2
Question
In which of the following cases did it become illegal to perform the contract?
Answer
-
Taylor v Caldwell
-
Fibrosa Spolka v Fairbarn
-
Condor v The Baron Knights
Question 3
Question
Was the contract frustrated in Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC?
Answer
-
Yes
-
No
Question 4
Question
Where a valuable benefit has been received this must be paid for according to which section of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943?
Answer
-
s2(1)
-
s1(2)
-
s1(1)
-
s1(3)
Question 5
Question
Why was the contract held to be frustrated in Taylor v Caldwell?
Answer
-
It wasn't
-
One of the parties was unavailable
-
The subject matter was unavailable
Question 6
Question
Why was the contract held NOT to be frustrated in Hearne Bay Shipping v Hutton?
Answer
-
The subject matter of the contract was unavailable
-
One of the parties was unavailable
-
The party was deprived of the whole commercial purpose of the contract
Question 7
Question
In Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH, did the closure of the Suez Canal frustrate the contract?
Answer
-
Yes
-
No
Question 8
Question
Can a contract be considered frustrated if one of the parties is at fault?
Answer
-
Yes
-
No
Question 9
Question
Will a contract be frustrated if the 'frustrating' event could have been foreseen?
Answer
-
Yes
-
No
Question 10
Question
Which case lead to the introduction of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943?
Answer
-
Taylor v Caldwell
-
BP Exploration v Hunt
-
Fibrosa Spolka v Fairbarn
-
Krell v Henry
Want to create your own Quizzes for free with GoConqr? Learn more.