Mindmap 2- Civil Liberties

Beschreibung

Note: Due to the sheer volume of civil liberties cases, this mind map will only include the specific facts of a case as they apply to the significance of the case.
Caroline Finley
Mindmap von Caroline Finley, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
Caroline Finley
Erstellt von Caroline Finley vor mehr als 8 Jahre
122
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Mindmap 2- Civil Liberties
  1. Gitlow v. New York
    1. Decided: 1925
      1. Significance: The Court, for the first time, nationalizes the Bill of Rights after socialist propaganda was distributed throughout New York.
      2. Weeks v. United States
        1. Decided: 1914
          1. Significance: Establishment of the exclusionary rule.
          2. Wolf v. Colorado
            1. Decided: 1946
              1. Significance: Continued development of the exclusionary rule.
              2. Mapp v. Ohio
                1. Decided: 1961
                  1. Significance: Made the exclusionary rule applicable to states.
                  2. Gideon v. Wainwright
                    1. Decided: 1963
                      1. Significance: Established statewide Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
                      2. Malloy v. Hogan
                        1. Decided: 1964
                          1. Significance: Further established rights of the accused pre-Miranda.
                          2. Miranda v. Arizona
                            1. Decided: 1966
                              1. Significance: Established that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in police custody.
                              2. Engel v. Vitale
                                1. Decided: 1962
                                  1. Significance: Struck down New York nondenominational prayers in schools as "establishment of religion".
                                  2. Everson v. Bd. of Ed.
                                    1. Decided: 1947
                                      1. Significance: First in a series of cases furthering establishment clause in schools, etc.
                                      2. Lemon v. Kurtzman
                                        1. Decided: 1971
                                          1. Significance: Established Lemon test for external expression of religion, furthered establishment clause.
                                          2. City of Boerne v. Flores
                                            1. Decided: 1997
                                              1. Significance: Struck down RFRA of 1993- reestablished separation of powers
                                              2. Cantwell v. Connecticut
                                                1. Decided: 1940
                                                  1. Significance: Furthered use of the Free Exercise Clause
                                                  2. Schenck v. United States
                                                    1. Decided: 1919
                                                      1. Significance: Free speech- "clear and present danger" doctrine established.
                                                      2. Miller v. California
                                                        1. Decided: 1973
                                                          1. Significance: Established the three-part "Miller test", or the standard used to judge the obscene.
                                                          2. Reno v. ACLU
                                                            1. Decided: 1997
                                                              1. Significance: Struck down a broad law pertaining to minors' accessing obscene internet content.
                                                              2. Tinker v. Des Moines
                                                                1. Decided: 1964
                                                                  1. Significance: Landmark symbolic speech case. Expression is protected as long it does not cause a "material disruption or substantial inference".
                                                                  2. Texas v. Johnson
                                                                    1. Decided: 1989
                                                                      1. Significance: Landmark symbolic speech case. The burning of the American flag is protected by the First Amendment.
                                                                      2. Furman v. Georgia
                                                                        1. Decided: 1972
                                                                          1. Significance: The Court ruled that the death penalty violated the 8th amendment because of the manner of which it was imposed.
                                                                          2. Gregg v. Georgia
                                                                            1. Decided: 1976
                                                                              1. Significance: The Court held up a state law that eliminated excessive jury discretion in imposing the death penalty.
                                                                              2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
                                                                                1. Decided: 1964
                                                                                  1. Significance: The Court defined both "libel" and "slander" as they pertained to public figures and officials.
                                                                                  2. Cruzan v. Director Missouri Dept. of Health
                                                                                    1. Decided: 1990
                                                                                      1. Significance: Right to privacy and right to die- lead to passages of "living will" statutes in many states.
                                                                                      2. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
                                                                                        1. Decided: 1992
                                                                                          1. Significance: Stated that states may restrict abortions, as long as they do not impose an "undue hardship or burden on the mother".
                                                                                          2. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
                                                                                            1. Decided: 1989
                                                                                              1. Significance: Another in the string of abortion issues regarding the equal protection clause.
                                                                                              2. Griswold v. Connecticut
                                                                                                1. Decided: 1965
                                                                                                  1. Significance: Court established a "penumbra" of rights- most remarkably, birth control under the 4th, 9th and 14th amendments.
                                                                                                  2. Roe v. Wade
                                                                                                    1. Decided: 1973
                                                                                                      1. Significance: Court establishes an absolute right to choice with abortions.
                                                                                                      2. Lawrence v. Texas
                                                                                                        1. Decided: 2003
                                                                                                          1. Significance: Court strikes down Texas law criminalizing certain gay rights.
                                                                                                          2. New York Times Co. v. United States
                                                                                                            1. Decided: 1971
                                                                                                              1. Significance: Established "prior restraint" in regards to government censorship.
                                                                                                              Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

                                                                                                              ähnlicher Inhalt

                                                                                                              Kleines Latein-Quiz
                                                                                                              anna.grillborzer0656
                                                                                                              Öff. Recht - Definitionen
                                                                                                              myJurazone
                                                                                                              Zivilrecht - Zivilprozessrecht Streitigkeiten
                                                                                                              myJurazone
                                                                                                              Kraftwerke und Stromsicherheit
                                                                                                              Peter Kasebacher
                                                                                                              IKA-Theoriefragen Serie 04 (15 Fragen)
                                                                                                              IKA ON ICT GmbH
                                                                                                              Funktionen Einführung und Geradenfunktionen
                                                                                                              Tahir Celikkol
                                                                                                              Machst du auch diese 10 typischen Fehler auf Deutsch?
                                                                                                              Dilyana Hunley
                                                                                                              Forstpolitik Krott
                                                                                                              Ulf Grätz
                                                                                                              METH QUANTI SS 2019
                                                                                                              Caroline Hannah
                                                                                                              Vetie Chirurgie 2020
                                                                                                              Henriette Greiner
                                                                                                              Vetie - Milchkunde 2016
                                                                                                              Birte Schulz